QTS-088 · Expert evidence · 2023

Proposed Te Pūtahi Ladies Mile Plan Variation – Response from Colin Shields and Dave Smith to Further Panel Transport Questions Raised on 13 December 2023

Response by Colin Shields (Tonkin & Taylor, Council's transport expert) and Dave Smith (Abley, for NZTA (Waka Kotahi)) to Te Pūtahi Ladies Mile hearing panel questions of 13 December 2023. Mr Shields provides population, geographic spread and bus route maps comparing Queenstown (population 33,860 over 156.7 km²) with Aspen, Colorado (10,390 over 83.7 km²). On a proposed additional SH6 access serving the Glenpanel Homestead and up to 180 unconsented dwellings, Mr Smith (Technical Note 3) considers an extra access appropriate if SH6 becomes a 60 km/h corridor, with left-in/left-out if Howards Drive is a roundabout or signals if signalised. Mr Shields disagrees: there is no NZTA agreement to use the access for 180 units, no ORC agreement for bus services, the access was described as temporary, and the NZUP Howards Drive roundabout does not free up capacity; if the Panel allows a permanent access it should be signalised. Appendix B reproduces NZTA's 2022 comment on the Flint's Park fast-track application. No reference to mass rapid transit.

What the document says

Context: The Te Pūtahi Ladies Mile (TPLM) hearing panel asked further transport questions on 13 December 2023. This joint response sets out the questions and answers from Colin Shields (Tonkin & Taylor; Council's expert) and Dave Smith (Abley; for NZTA (Waka Kotahi)) (p.1).

Question 1 – Aspen comparison: Mr Shields gives the wider Queenstown population as 33,860 over 156.7 km² (Statistics NZ 2023 estimates for SA2s with nearby public transport) and Aspen at 10,390 over 83.7 km² (p.1), with mesh-block population maps and bus network maps for both, including Aspen's VelociRFTA bus rapid transit (pp.2–7, largely image pages).

Question 2 – additional SH6 access: The Panel asked whether a new SH6 access, consented for a café/gallery reuse of the Glenpanel Homestead and said to be designed for 180 unconsented dwellings, would be appropriate in a 60 km/h environment, and in what form (p.8). Mr Smith (Technical Note 3, Revision A, 18 December 2023) answers that an additional access would be appropriate if SH6 were redesigned and posted as 60 km/h, and could support urbanisation; a left-in/left-out configuration if Howards Drive is a roundabout, or signals if Howards Drive is signalised (p.12).

Mr Shields considers there is no NZTA agreement for 180 residential units on the access, no ORC agreement for bus services, and NZTA described the access as temporary until the east–west collector road is built (pp.8–9). His Sidra assessment of the NZUP Howards Drive roundabout shows a 75-vehicle AM queue on the SH6 east approach even without TPLM development, so it does not free capacity (p.9). He notes Council recommends no development until bus lanes west of the bridge are complete (p.9). He does not consider an additional access appropriate; if the Panel allows a permanent one, it should be signalised (p.10).

Appendix B: NZTA's 2022 comment on the Flint's Park fast-track application (EPA FTC000049; Richard Shaw, Team Leader South) states SH6 is at capacity in the AM peak and 'mode shift at an unprecedented level is necessary' (p.18), supports a 180-unit cap until the collector road is built, and seeks an SH6 underpass, ORC-certified bus stops, a 0.27 on-street car parks per dwelling maximum, noise and access consent notices, and advice notes on certification panels (pp.18–25).

Mass rapid transit: The document says nothing about mass rapid transit for Queenstown. The only rapid transit mentioned is Aspen's VelociRFTA bus rapid transit, on a map legend (p.7).

Key figures

  • Wider Queenstown population 33,860 over 156.7 km² (p.1)
  • Aspen area population 10,390 over 83.7 km² (p.1)
  • Proposed Homestead SH6 access said to serve up to 180 unconsented dwellings (p.8)
  • Sidra: NZUP Howards Drive roundabout AM queue of 75 vehicles on SH6 east approach with no TPLM development (p.9)
  • NZTA 2022: Ladies Mile on-street parking 0.27 x 2,400 units = 650 parks; seeks 0.27 as maximum (p.24)

Files

Public copies

Publisher’s own file.

Actions recorded

  • If SH6 is posted at 60 km/h, an additional access may be provided: left-in/left-out if Howards Drive is a roundabout, signalised if Howards Drive is signalised.

    Not assessed · Independent Hearing Panel

    a Left In Left Out configuration would be appropriate

  • Do not provide the additional Homestead access; if a permanent access is allowed it should be a signalised intersection compatible with Stalker Road and Howards Drive signals.

    Not assessed · Independent Hearing Panel

    this should take the form of a signal intersection

  • No TPLM development until bus lanes west of the Shotover Bridge are complete (Council's recommended amendment, as reported).

    Not assessed · QLDC · Prior to development

    no development can take place until the bus lanes are complete west of the bridge

  • Flint's Park (2022 NZTA comment): construct a public SH6 underpass in Stage 1, location agreed with Waka Kotahi, accommodating a shared path.

    Not assessed · Stage 1 of development

    construct a public underpass under SH6

  • Flint's Park (2022 NZTA comment): provide bus stops certified by ORC; make 0.27 on-street parks per dwelling a maximum, not a minimum.

    Not assessed

    the 0.27 on-street parks per unit should be a maximum rather than a minimum

Study cost

A study cost has been requested under the Official Information Act or LGOIMA. No figure has been received.

Citation

NZTA (Waka Kotahi), QLDC. Proposed Te Pūtahi Ladies Mile Plan Variation – Response from Colin Shields and Dave Smith to Further Panel Transport Questions Raised on 13 December 2023 (2023). Abley Technical Note 3, job NZTA-J321.

Spotted an error in this entry? Tell us